Chasing Boojums

Weather control "Theories"

Regarding the popular weather control conspiracies,

Left ,Right, doesn't matter meat puppets abound. Narcissistic tail chasing while barking “look at me”. The wealthy over lords love it when we are distracted, chasing our tails, bickering about falsehoods.

Yes there are patents. There are patents for warp drive!

That doesn't mean those have been functionally deployed.

Things that work in controlled lab conditions, (Closed systems) on small scale are one thing.

The large scale dynamic conditions, are another.

I have worked with both Lasers and Masers over a distance. Atmospheric diffusion was a major problem with lasers. Masers don't have that problem. Thus Masers, microwaves, make great distance measuring tools. Like in modern Surveying theodolite. EDMs, electronics distance meters. They also make fantastic communication devices, to communicate with, for example, our submarine fleet when submerged and standard radio is ineffective.

Simple Directed microwaves are even more problematic than masers for manipulation of atmospheric conditions.

A maser being a coherent beam of microwaves, transfers energy like a laser.

Simple directional microwaves, which are in fact high frequency radio waves, would require such enormous levels of energy to generate actual atmospheric effects, or weather manipulation, that it is functionally ineffective. Not only do we not have the energy production capacity ,There would be ionization, heat expansion, along the entire route, from source to target.

Not to mention there would need be an absorbed material at the target point to convert the energy to heat.

Lasers, capable of changing atmospheric conditions, face the same essential issues.

Sound waves, transfer energy via waves. Again, the energy required to create atmospheric changes is astronomical, not to mention the side effects between source and target.

I have neither seen, nor heard of any examples indicating the actual use of Microwaves or lasers, to manipulate climate.

Sound may have potential for extremely localized effect. Beyond triggering precipitation in local effect, I cannot see it's use in directing such dynamic events as a Hurricane.

Now, cloud seeding can impact localized precipitation also. The recent effects of flooding in Dubai and the Saudi Arabian peninsula are an example that cloud seeding works and is in fact, unpredictable.

Interestingly, There are events that employ enough energy to impact Weather, as well as earth quakes and volcanic action.

Events which have been occurring concurrent with the recent weather events.

Solar wind, Coronal mass ejections.

Which have been occurring.

And are being effectively ignored.

Primarily, I believe because the facts dispute the popular anthropomorphic climate change narrative.

A side note.

While people focus on HAARP, as a weather control system, I notice other known effects of high energy Microwave tech are Not being discussed.

Emotional state manipulation and created Brain damage, being the principal two. Events from the U.S. embassy staff in Havana Cuba reflect the effective use of directed microwaves. There are examples also from U.S. embassy personnel in Moscow.

Why are these situations not being discussed?

Sound, also, causes similar effects. Again, the implementation, of high energy sound, low frequency or high frequency would create harmonic resonances in the environment. Again, with effects shown at the source, the distance between, and the targeted area.

As far as I have found, We are not seeing this.

Yes, sound manipulation can be used for localized effect. It can be weaponized to weaken and damage buildings, bridges, and other localized targets.

However,

Altering the path of a hurricane?

Something with energy levels thousands of times those released in our most powerful nuclear weapons. I don't see it happening.

Consider this;

"A hurricane also releases energy through the formation of clouds and rain (it takes energy to evaporate all that water). If we crunch the numbers for an average hurricane (1.5 cm/day of rain, circle radius of 665 km), we get a gigantic amount of energy: 6.0 x 10^14 Watts or 5.2 x 10^19 Joules/day!

This is equivalent to about 200 times the total electrical generating capacity on the planet! NASA says that "during its life cycle a hurricane can expend as much energy as 10,000 nuclear bombs!" And we're just talking about average hurricanes here, not Katrina."

From;

https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/energy/energy-hurricane-volcano-earthquake1.htm#:~:text=This%20is%20equivalent%20to%20about%20200%20times%20the%20total%20electrical,average%20hurricanes%20here%2C%20not%20Katrina.

Wave forms, and function, and effect are amazingly similar.

The math works.

Our entire electronic world demonstrates this as a fact.

The math dictates the energy requirements.

While we bicker and chase our tails, pursuing boojums, our elite would be masters profit.

Divided we are ruled,

Distracted by false narratives,

We are confused,

Made incapable of seeing the truth right before our eyes.

Another point.

Anyone that has dealt with the U.S. government, agencies, the military, programs, implementation of programs, can testify to the systemic incompetence therein.

The U.S. postal service, Amtrak, FEMA, the DOJ, the department of defense are merely examples.

Do you really think they would be capable of the deployment and management of such capabilities as climate control?

Make no mistake, manipulation of a single hurricane would cause world wide, long term climate effects.

Energy cannot be created or destroyed, Energy can only be transfered/transformed.

The energy required to control weather on the scale of a Hurricane would have to come from somewhere, and go somewhere.

People point at the butterfly effect as a potential.

Entropy, is only one of the obstacle in control. The level of complexity required to control the butterfly effect is currently unimaginable.

The number of changing dynamic variables involved, are beyond human capacity to comprehend.

Combine the complexity factors, multiplied by the entropy factors and you find that the creation, and directive management capability required is, God like.

In short simply far beyond the capacity of humanity at this time.

There is not enough computing power combined if every single computer system on the planet today were networked to try.

I should also point out the electrical power required to operate that computer network.

In summary

Yes weather and climate control is theoretically possible.

That doesn't mean it is probable.

In theory, should a cat have a square anus, ( wombat factor) and you fed it clay, the cat would defecate bricks. Not a very probable event, let alone productive.

We will not discuss the monumental displeasure of the Cat or the resulting expression of that displeasure.

Just because an idea sounds good does not mean it is a good idea.